Based on his study of the ability of U. Mahnken also suggests three factors that influence the capability of intelligence organizations to detect innovation. First, they are more likely to monitor the development of established weaponry than to search for new military systems. Second, they tend to pay more attention to technology and doctrine successfully demonstrated in combat than to those not proven in this way.
Intelligence in War: Knowledge of the Enemy from Napoleon to Al-Qaeda
Third, they find it easier to identify innovation in areas that their own services are exploring than in those the services have not examined or have rejected. One explanation for the difference of opinion regarding the value of intelligence lies in the way the two authors define their subject. Keegan [End Page ] intends the title of his book literally; he is interested only in wartime intelligence—the short-term, usually clandestine effort to collect information that contributes to success in battle.
He refers to peacetime intelligence as "espionage" and suggests that it is unseemly, untrustworthy, inscrutable, and worst of all, indecisive. Keegan identifies two types of wartime intelligence, strategic intelligence and real-time intelligence. Strategic intelligence comprises general information on enemy strengths, weaknesses, intentions, and dispositions, while real-time intelligence is information on enemy location, composition, and objective acquired in time to make operational or tactical use of it.
Historically, the relative value of each type has been determined by the level of technological development, especially speed of communications. As long as this did not exceed the speed of enemy movement, strategic intelligence was most important, although it rarely conveyed an advantage in actual time and space. The introduction of more rapid means of communication beginning in the nineteenth century, however, made real-time intelligence possible.
Keegan therefore sees the history of modern military intelligence as largely the history of signals intelligence.
Yet he is careful to point out that even successful signals intelligence does not ensure military victory. The British ability to decrypt enciphered messages sent by the German Enigma machine provided foreknowledge of the timing, objectives, and composition of the airborne invasion of Crete in , but could not prevent its loss. Project MUSE promotes the creation and dissemination of essential humanities and social science resources through collaboration with libraries, publishers, and scholars worldwide.
Great overview of how intelligence developed, just needed more modern content to truly be a full overview. This is not an espionage or technical book, but a review of modern military history with a focus on intelligence. If you enjoy military history you will love this book.
Booklist calls Keegan "the most popular, and perhaps the best, contemporary writer of military history. The extraordinary insight Keegan brings to his a very complex subject, matched, as is the case with all great stylists, a command of language equal to the task. Keegan is primarily an historian with no axes to grind but one who rather, in book after book, brings his axe a jazz term for instrument to providing a profound human understanding of a subject I had always thought boring until I picked my first JK book, The Face of Battle. This by now great classic looks at battle from the foot soldier's perspective four different battles spanning over years with the purpose of understanding, psychologically, behaviorally, historically, and, put it this way -- humanly -- what is going one in such scenarios of carnage and death.
Keegan takes on our age's mesmerizing fixation with intelligence and gives a stressed warning for those fighting al Qaeda to "shorten their swords" i. Intelligence in War is all about the limits of intelligence in war as it spans in great and intriguing detail specific cases that illuminate given subsidiary points of the thesis.
Intelligence in War: Knowledge of the Enemy from Napoleon to Al-Qaeda, John Keegan
He using specific times in history to show the how intelligence impacted decisions. He shows how, in many cases, the impact of intelligence is overrated and that battle are won in the field. The narrator is fine. When politicians deride intelligence professionals, I would hope, someday, the average citizen will have the understanding of the subject as laid out here to refute that assertion. Intelligence helps win wars but, it is not panacea.
This book will give readers a better footing to grasp the finer points throughout the last few hundred years to better grasp that fact. Love this historylesson and I think you will too. Excellent rendering, by Richard Matthews, of one of our finest war historians. Keegan, in his Face of Battle a great work despite the scores here , believes that chaos is the hallmark of battle, and in this survey claims that, while important, intelligence is rarely crucial to war outcomes.
Here, Keegan backs up his thesis but devotes, for me, too much narrative to battle details, reeling off operational statisticsj to the point where intelligence almost seems parenthetical. This muddles the focus, and I come away with the drift of his argument but still unconvinced. Would you recommend this audiobook to a friend? If so, why? Yes -- this is best book I've encountered that examines intel in perspective -- the contribution it can make and its limitations. What was one of the most memorable moments of Intelligence in War?
The book examines a series of case studies illustrating where intel fits into the conduct of war. There are numerous practical examples, and the author gives the background that helps the reader understand his viewpoint. How does this one compare? No, I have not, however his rendering of this work was completely appropriate to the content.
Hard to choose: I knew the generalities underlying many of the case studies, but the author filled in so many blanks in my knowledge that it's difficult to choose one. The comment that the book is mistitled is, in my opinion, incorrect. If what was expected was a complete history of the evolution of intelligence in warfare, this is, indeed, not it. To understand the point, one has to understand the context, and the author's detailed presentation of his research, reinforces his premise whether I agree with it wholly or not brilliantly.
I would recommend the book to any student of the forces at work in the conduct of warfare, and the focus on specific examples throughout history gives his message power. Purchased in hopes of gaining fresh history on intel but instead slipped back to 9th grade history class.
Did not find new knowledge here. Your audiobook is waiting….
By: John Keegan. Narrated by: Richard Matthews. Length: 15 hrs and 4 mins. Categories: History , Military. People who bought this also bought Dulles Narrated by: L.
Intelligence in War (Audiobook) by John Keegan | partcenlingfilttur.ml
Ganser Length: 11 hrs and 48 mins Unabridged Overall. Pratt Length: 12 hrs and 28 mins Unabridged Overall. Hayden Narrated by: Michael V. Hayden Length: 8 hrs and 27 mins Unabridged Overall. Publisher's Summary In fiction, the spy is a glamorous figure whose secrets make or break peace, but, historically, has intelligence really been a vital step to military victories? In this breakthrough study, the preeminent war historian John Keegan goes to the heart of a series of important conflicts to develop a powerful argument about military intelligence.
In his characteristically wry and perceptive prose, Keegan offers us nothing short of a new history of war through the prism of intelligence. Critic Reviews "The author is the most popular, and perhaps the best, contemporary writer of military history. What members say Average Customer Ratings Overall. Amazon Reviews. Sort by:.
Most Helpful Most Recent. Littman OH Military history more than history of intelligence John Keegan is always an interesting writer. Solid read, but misleading title.
Scotty Florida Excellent This is not an espionage or technical book, but a review of modern military history with a focus on intelligence. John Keegan does it again Booklist calls Keegan "the most popular, and perhaps the best, contemporary writer of military history. Fiona BangkokThailand Interesting, knowledgeable and well read He using specific times in history to show the how intelligence impacted decisions. Josh
Related Intelligence In War: Knowledge of the Enemy from Napoleon to Al-Qaeda
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved